For that to happen, the Vatican will once again have to provide access to the shroud, which appears to be in doubt, as officials with the church have proven reluctant to allow further testing. People who read the title of this book will probably divide into two camps: those who already believe the piece of cloth known as the Holy Shroud and preserved in Turin cathedral to be the actual winding sheet of the crucified Christ and those who think the author has allowed his. The researchers suggest that new studies must be conducted on the shroud if its true date is to be ascertained. A Catholic Scientist Champions the Shroud of Turin By Gerard Verschuuren, Sophia Institute Press, 2021, 240 pages. In a recent interview with L"Homme Nouveau, Tristan Casabianca, team lead on the new effort, claimed that the raw data from the 1988 tests showed that the test samples were heterogeneous, invalidating the results.
Then some challenged the testing process because scientists had examined. 1360, many dispelled the legend surrounding the artifact. After radiocarbon testing in the 1980s dated its origin between A.D. Edge pieces from the shroud are rumored to have been tampered with by nuns in the Middle Ages seeking to restore damage done to the shroud over the years. The Shroud of Turin revered by many as the burial cloth of Jesus might be authentic after all, a new DNA study suggests. After studying the data for two years, the new research team announced that the study from 1988 was flawed because it did not involve study of the entire shroud-just some edge pieces. In this new effort, the research team sued the University of Oxford, which had the data, for access-and won. But there was a problem with the findings-the Vatican, which owns the shroud, refused to allow other researchers access to the data. Allen says the whole matter of the Shroud’s age could be settled if the Catholic powers permitted a non-destructive test for microscopic amounts of silver. As part of the research effort, several research entities were chosen to examine individual pieces of cloth from the shroud, but in the end, only three were allowed to do so: The University of Arizona in the U.S., the Federal Institute of Technology in Switzerland and Oxford University in the U.K.Īfter testing was concluded, the researchers announced that all three research groups had dated their cloth snippets to a time between 12-evidence that the shroud was not from the time of Christ. The claim by some Shroud advocates that a medieval forger couldn’t have possessed the technology to fake it is, therefore, nonsense. 'Uncovering the sources of DNA found on the Turin Shroud.' Scientific Reports 5, Article number: 14484.
Source: Gianni Barcaccia, Giulio Galla, Alessandro Achilli, Anna Olivieri & Antonio Torroni. Back in 1988, a team of researchers was granted access to the Shroud of Turin-a small piece of cloth that many believe was used to cover the face of Christ after crucifixion. The Turin Shroud is traditionally considered to be the burial cloth in which the body of Jesus Christ was wrapped after his death approximately 2000 years. For now, despite this rich new body of evidence, it seems the Shroud of Turin will remain shrouded in mystery.
0 kommentar(er)
